Title
Studies have shown that the most costly and challenging patients are those with co-occurring physical and behavioral health issues combined with challenges involving social determinants of health such as food insecurity, housing instability or involvement with the criminal justice system. Research has also shown that collaboration between physical health, behavioral health and social service providers improves outcomes and lowers cost. Although the evidence is less definitive, studies have shown that technology-enabled workflows for patient engagement and care collaboration, including online and mobile applications, can improve health outcomes and lower cost.
Unfortunately, conventional electronic health record and social service systems have several disadvantages related to allowing organizations to create and deploy electronic workflows for patient engagement and care collaboration. For example, conventional electronic health record and social service systems fail to account for the fact that many organizations lack experience in designing, implementing or managing an effective electronic workflow system for patient engagement or care collaboration. In particular, conventional electronic workflow systems often rely on one or a few users within an organization to select an underlying evidence-based practice model, to design the organization’s specific implementation of that evidence-based practice, and to evaluate pre-configured software applications, or to manage the process of configuring, programming, evaluating and training users for a complex workflow system. Moreover, few organizations have the knowledge or expertise to bridge the gap in practice standards and workflow between physical health, behavioral health and social supports. Using conventional electronic health record and social service systems is a time-consuming, costly and risky effort for most healthcare and social services organizations. Accordingly, because of these complexities along with the need for specific expertise and costly design and programming services, most organizations choose simply not to adopt technology-enabled workflows for patient engagement and care collaboration.
Despite these challenges, there is an increasing demand for technology-enabled patient engagement and community care collaboration. Early versions of technology-enabled patient engagement and care collaboration began to show up in the 1990s, generally following one of three tracks:
However, beginning with legislation early in the 21st century, including HITECH and ARRA in 2009 and the Affordable Care Act of 2010, the market began to see an increased focus on the role of technology with closer ties to funding models including Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance. These requirements focused on replacing paper records with electronic records and promoting electronic health information exchange of clinical data. The requirements and financial incentives were primarily focused on physical health with limited incentive for behavioral health and no provisions to address social determinants of health.
More recently, policy and regulation at both the federal and state levels are providing new incentives for electronic workflows for patient engagement and care collaboration that extends across healthcare and social services. Following are the key barriers and challenges that remain:
What is needed is an electronic workflow system that guides user/administrators to easily design, test, evaluate, deploy and manage electronic workflows without the need for costly consulting and programming services. The electronic workflow system also needs to guide users to understand how well their systems conform to evolving evidence-based practice, standards and requirements. While other industries, such as web-page design and surveys, have adopted similar technologies, no one has previously designed or developed solutions for the guided creation for the unique requirements of healthcare and social services for patient engagement and care collaboration. proVizor is the solution.